Nobody can state the ROI, so nobody can defend the price
A company that cannot express what its product is worth in the customer's own numbers will discount under pressure, lose renewals it should win, and never raise prices. This is one of the most tractable problems in the first 100 days after an acquisition.
Ask a software company what its product is worth to a customer. The weak answer is a list of features. The common answer is a category claim: we save time, we reduce risk, we improve efficiency. The strong answer is a number in the customer’s own units, with the customer’s own name attached to it.
When the answer that comes back is the middle one, it costs the company in 3 places at once, and all 3 are visible in the data before anyone admits them in a meeting.
Where it shows up
In discounting. A representative who cannot articulate value has one lever left when a buyer pushes on price. Discount discipline is the cleanest measurable symptom, and it sits in the billing data.
In renewals. A renewal conversation with no quantified value is a budget conversation, and budget conversations in a tight year go badly. The retention data says the year is tight. Across the 342 companies in the 2026 Aleph and Benchmarkit benchmarks, median gross revenue retention fell from 88% to 84% between 2024 and 2025, and it fell in every quartile: the top quartile from 95 to 91%, the bottom from 81 to 76. A decline that reaches the strongest operators as well as the weakest reads as a market-level shift rather than an execution failure at any one company. In that environment, being unable to state a number costs more than it used to.
In pricing. Nobody raises prices on a value proposition they cannot express. The price stays where it was set, usually years earlier, often by intuition.
Why this is a post-close job rather than a diligence finding
You can identify the problem in diligence. You cannot fix it there, because fixing it means talking to customers as their vendor rather than as a prospective buyer, and changing what the sales team says, which is not something a diligence provider gets to do.
After close it becomes tractable quickly, and it is unusually good value for the effort. The raw material is already inside the company: customers who have renewed repeatedly and can say why, support tickets that show which workflows actually get used, and win and loss records that show which arguments moved a deal.
The work is turning that into a value model the sales team can carry into a room. What the customer measured before, what they measure now, and the difference expressed in their units rather than yours. Then testing it in live calls and correcting it, which is the part most often skipped.
What changes when it lands
Discounting becomes a decision rather than a reflex. Renewals stop being budget conversations. And pricing becomes movable, which matters because the next article in this series is about what happens to companies whose pricing has not been examined since it was set.
More insights
Pricing built before the market changed
Seat-based pricing is no longer the default it was, and among the companies buyers look at in this range it often was not the default to begin with. What matters in diligence is not which model a target uses but whether anyone has examined it since it was set, and what moving it would cost.
The ARR that is not ARR
ARR is a management convention, not an accounting standard, and the convention is set by the seller. Reconstructing the recurring base from billing data rather than accepting the ARR schedule is often the single largest price mover in a software deal.
Last updated